scottyyyc said:
Given how competitive the vehicle market is nowadays, you can bet that GM has programmed the ECU about as good as can be expected, without starting to make big sacrifices elsewhere. If GM could have magically gotten another couple MPG they would have already. Why would they release an engine that does 180HP and gets 32MPG when they could easily release an the same engine with 200HP and 37MPG? Like gearhead says, if it sounds too good to be true...
I do a lot of aftermarket ECU tuning on sportbikes, and by itself, reprogramming the ECU doesn't do very much. On an high-performance 1L engine you get 2 or 3 more horses at the rear wheel. Last bike I put a power-commander on it went from 158rwhp to 160rwhp. Whoopie-do. Only if you replace the whole exhaust system and intake do you start to see double-digit gains.[/color]
I'd wait until a more reputable tuning shop releases a product, and/or until you're ready to say goodbye to your warranty.
Very good points, scottyyyc.
The engine has been dialed in by GM engineers for maximum performance and drivability over a wide range of conditions and temperatures.
Modifying factory timing/airflow/fuel control settings without changing the intake or exhaust would probably cause more harm than good from a drivability standpoint, IMO.
Remember, with the Direct Injection system, a precise amount of fuel is delivered to the combustion chamber at exactly the correct time for maximum power, lower fuel consumption and cleaner burn.
You'd have to know the software/hardware timing extremely well to make beneficial adjustments.
It's highly unlikely that anyone without some inside help is privy to that type of info right now to be able to release it to the public, especially not for 9 bucks IMHO.